In an article in GovTech, Madeline Frasier Cook, LISC’s vice president for community building and resilient solutions, discusses how community members must be part of public transit planning, and all facets of community life taken into account. Policy makers and local leaders promoting transit-oriented development should be “very explicit about investment in affordable housing, and calling out that [there has to be] access for everyone. They can’t be displacing people.”
The excerpt below was originally published by GovTech:
Equity Moves to the Center of Transportation Planning in Austin
By Skip Descant, GovTech
....Transit-oriented developments, known in planning-speak as TODs, are often touted as ideal developments that bring together increased housing, density and transit, all benefiting each other, and creating a setting that is inherently less car-dependent. However, these developments have been known to lean heavily toward upscale housing and retail which then often out-prices existing residents. [A] plan offered by CapMetro — in partnership with the city, the Austin Transit Partnership and the Community Advisory Committee — places housing and transportation equity at the center of the planning process.
As part of the process, CapMetro developed the ETOD Policy Toolkit, made up of 46 policy tools to aid in the planning process of the areas around new light rail stations. These policy tools address small business and workforce development, housing, various forms of mobility and real estate.
Increasingly, the TOD planning process is placing equity in a more central role, said Madeline Fraser Cook, vice president of community building and resilient solutions at Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC), a nonprofit providing financial, technical and other assistance to developers working in underserved communities.
“For many years now we’ve had transit-oriented development funds that are very intentional about not only funding the work of TODs — funding buildings within a quarter-mile, half-mile from transit — but also being very explicit about this TOD investment being in affordable housing, and calling out that these communities have to have access for everyone. They can’t be displacing people,” said Cook.
Community engagement is often required of a number of funding sources like the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, in part, to guard against gentrification pressures.
“But that is very difficult to do. You need to be very intentional about how to do community engagement, and how to do it well,” said Cook.
“I work with a lot of cities, and I work with a lot of community organizations, and despite some of the best efforts, it’s very hard to get people to go to these community engagement meetings if that’s the only thing you do. You have to be more creative, more intentional in terms of outreach,” she added.
LISC has been involved in the development of Cycle House, an affordable and green development housing project in a quickly gentrifying neighborhood of Washington, D.C. The project is a four-story mixed-use structure with 15 rental apartments and commercial and retail space on the ground floor. The project will also be certified LEED Platinum, with an ability to generate as much energy as it uses, proving that energy efficiency — and the savings it can mean for residents — can be realized with affordable housing developments.
“By its nature being a net-zero building you’re addressing some of the concerns around long-term energy affordability,” said Cook. “The mixed-use nature of it too is important, in terms of fitting into the neighborhood fabric, making sure that there is the opportunity for more economic activity in the neighborhood.”